I like saying those words. He’s a politician, not a messiah, but it’s such a goddamned relief to see sanity and competence return to the fore.
I like saying those words. He’s a politician, not a messiah, but it’s such a goddamned relief to see sanity and competence return to the fore.
There once was a time when it was nice to get Time or Newsweek in order to scan the past week’s events, get a somewhat fuller picture of the news, and simply catch up. I’m going back a couple of decades, sprouts, when Time would actually run deeply reported stories, give somebody like Robert Hughes beaucoup column inches to talk about modern art, or offer detailed schematics and diagrams of Three Mile Island to help readers understand how close Pennsylvania came to being renamed the Forbidden Zone.
You can water down your product only so many times before people start wondering why they need another stack of recycling fodder in the garage. And if you think pumping up the amount of punditry and opinion-mongering is the key to your magazine’s survival, you might want to consider giving space to fresh and original thinkers, not party operatives like William Kristol and Karl Rove who divide their time between getting things wrong and lying about the world.
So when I hear Howie Kurtz keening over the decline of the glossies, I find it have to give a damn. Give me information and give me breadth, or get lost. The “media savvy” bigwigs running those magazines just sound like higher paid, better groomed versions of the hack newspaper editors I used to see, who decided that alienating people who read newspapers was the key to getting more readership. Adio, bozos.
An obvious choice for today, but what’s more appropriate? Martin Luther King Jr. was the right man at the right time. Without him, there isn’t a doubt in my mind that the American South would currently resemble Belfast in the Seventies.
Few bands have retooled their sound as completely, or as lucratively, as the Moody Blues. After trying to make a go of it as a not-bad Merseybeat group with decent taste in R&B (they even backed Sonny Boy Williamson for a time during his stay in the U.K.) they took the sound of Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Heart’s Club Band and ran with it. Starting with Days of Future Past, released in 1967 only a few months after Sgt. Pepper, they racked up big sales as progressive rockers, packaging their albums along lose conceptual lines, enhanced with the trippy artwork of Phil Travers. The foundation of their new sound was the Mellotron, a proto-synthesizer that used tapes of string instruments to approximate the sound of an orchestra. In this 1970 clip of the band performing “Tuesday Afternoon,” you can spot bandmember Mike Pinder on his Mellotron, which he had extensively tweaked for the band’s purposes.
It’s hard to believe that anyone ever took that thin, reedy whine for a string section, but as this MetaFilter link package reminds us, the Mellotron was quickly taken up by the Kinks and other bands looking for a progressive flavor.
At the risk of losing whatever hipness credentials I may possess, I confess to a lingering fondness for the Moody Blues. Chalk it up to those first couple of years in high school, when I thought Every Good Boy Deserves Favour was the most profound set of songs ever scratched onto both sides of a black vinyl disc. By my junior year I’d come to think there was something a bit . . . overripe about their Rod McKuen versifying, and Graeme Edge’s poetic musings could have been dropped into This Is Spinal Tap without anyone being the wiser. But there was a lot of pop songcraft beneath the overdubs, and there’s a decent single-disc compilation to be culled from their bulky catalogue. But please, make sure you cut out the poetry.
One of the sins on my conscience is having participated in the one time that I witnessed Moody Blues lyrics being used as an instrument of torture. I was at a party long ago with a couple of acquaintances, one a hipper-than-thou type, and when he learned that the other acquaintance had been a Moody Blues fan, he showed no mercy.
“Breathe deep the gathering gloom,” Hipper Than Thou rumbled.
“Yeah, okay, I never liked that one,” the victim sighed.
“With the force of a million butterfly sneezes,” Hipper Than Thou continued, “man has conquered the wayward breezes.”
“Oh come on!” the victim protested. “Enough! I give up.” He turned to me, obviously hoping to change the direction of the conversation.
I looked him in the eye and intoned: “When the white eagle of the north flies low overhead, and the leaves of autumn lie in the gutter, dead . . .”
The victim went howling off and I never saw him again that night. I think he changed his name and signed aboard a tramp steamer, trying to escape the shame and make a new life somewhere. I’m not proud of what I did, but I wont deny it was fun at the time.
I’m about as interested in this summer’s Star Trek relaunch as I am in handicapping the Tibetan yak races, but Dances With Mermaids took to the Star Wars movies in a pretty big way, so I Netflixed Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. Chiefly because I remembered it as having been a legitimately good action movie after the grinding bore that was the original flick, and because Dances was interested in the fact that the villain was played by Ricardo Montalban, the grandpa from the Spy Kids flicks.
Let’s just say the flick hasn’t aged well. The Woman Warrior and I kept cracking up at Khan’s fright wig, and the mumbo-jumbo in the dialogue kept Dances With Mermaids asking for explanations of what was going on. When it was all over, she said: “It was just a lot of people in uniforms standing around talking.”
Guess I better not rent The Final Frontier, eh?
An insider look at the publishing industry. Hey, I learned from this thing. (Bird-dogged by Andrew Sullivan.)
If you’re as tired as I am with the brain-dead arguments over “liberal media bias,” read this Jay Rosen piece on how the mass-market media shape and corral political debate (and how the rise of bloggers, some of them with expertise to rival that of many journalists and pundits, is weakening that power), then listen to Rosen’s chat with Glenn Greenwald.
A while back I posted this take on a very famous author’s five simple rules for writing. Now Joe Z. reminds me of an earlier debate about whether revisions are a good thing or a watering-down of one’s initial inspiration. My contribution to that talk, dredged from the depths of Joe’s comment fields:
Early to bed, early to rise; revise revise revise.
Beginning writers are commonly afflicted with two mistaken ideas: (a) you only write when inspiration comes over you (preferably late at night, while the bourgeois are asleep and the Muse comes skipping over the rooftops and springs through the open window of your garrett), and (b) your first drafts are always best because that’s when your inspiration is at its freshest.
As a former sufferer, I can attest that a third delusion grew naturally out of the first two: since the initial writing is always the best, I had to make sure everything was perfect before I could go on. This meant that whenever I hit a speed bump while barreling through a writing project, I would get stuck there, trying to solve a problem while my inspiration and fire dwindled away.
The net result was a drawerful of unfinished and half-realized projects.
In my case, the first-draft delusion grew out of my school days, when I habitually larked off on assignments until the very last minute, then fulfilled them in a frenzy of caffeine-drenched activity. Since these assignments almost always won good grades, I received positive reinforcement for a very bad writing habit. The fact that I worked for many years in the newspaper business, constantly writing for tight deadlines, didn’t do much to improve the situation. On top of that, I’ve been a Bob Dylan fan most of my life, and he’s famous for winging it in the studio and releasing first takes of songs because he wants that fresh, spontaneous sound. When that approach works, you get Blonde on Blonde. When it doesn’t, you get Down in the Groove.
First drafts contain nuggets of pure gold. They also contain plenty of boilerplate and second-hand phrases that need to be reassessed in the cold light of day. True creative freedom and productivity followed when I realized that
second, third and even fourth drafts are not only acceptable — they’re desirable. I didn’t have to stop when I hit a bad patch — I could always slap something in and come back a few days later with a fresh point of view. Nine times out of ten, continuing with the work took the story in a direction that solved the problem for me. Then I could go back to the rough patch and come up with a more artful way to set the stage for events to come.
Another great thing about this approach is that it allows you to become more humane with your writing regimen. I used to think that I couldn’t write anything unless I had a big bloc of time in which to pursue the Muse. I now know that I can accomplish more in a concentrated one-hour writing session than I can by putting aside an entire afternoon. I also know that I do my clearest thinking in the morning, so I schedule that brief session before the kids wake up. A regular writing schedule doesn’t make you a drone. Keeping a regular schedule means the Muse will know where to find you.
The marvelous thing about this arrangement is the fact that it aids concentration. When I tried to write for hours at a time, the least distraction would have me clutching my hair and pounding the desk like Roderick Usher. Now I think I could write on the lip of an erupting volcano and not even notice the ash in my hair.
So, let all tyros take note. You don’t have to get it all right the first time. Most of the time you won’t anyway. The only really successful first draft I’m aware of was written on the top of Mount Sinai. Personally, I think even that would have benefitted from a few additional drafts.